Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- hutan_bukit_tunggul [2025/09/03 10:21] – [2016-03-17: Liputan The Star] sazli
+++ hutan_bukit_tunggul [2025/09/03 11:09] (kini) – [2020-11: Dapat Kajian Lapangan] sazli
@@ Line 376: / Line 376: @@
 Sumber: [[https://ias.ubd.edu.bn/zawawi-ibrahim/|Zawawi Ibrahim]], 2016: {{ lampiran:chapte2humaninsecuritis.pdf ||}}[[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307507311_Anthropologizing_Human_Insecurities_Narrating_the_Subjugated_Discourse_of_Indigenes_on_the_Deterritorialized_Landscapes_of_the_Malaysian_Nation-State|"Anthropologizing Human Insecurities: Narrating the Subjugated Discourse of Indigenes on the Deterritorialized Landscapes of the Malaysian Nation-State", m.s.38]]).
+==== 2016-03-17: Liputan The Star ====
+{{:akhbar:thestar-20150317-orangaslidengkil.png?450|Loh Foon Fong @ The Star, 17 March 2015}} \\
+//"Land issues affecting the orang asli in Bukit Tunggul and Bukit Jenuk, near Dengkil, need to be resolved so that they can be provided with amenities, says the Centre for Orang Asli Concerns. \\
+The centre's coordinator Dr Colin Nicholas said only landowners could apply for amenities, but the orang asli did not have land titles. \\
+'Solve the orang asli land issue first by recognising the existing villages as orang asli reserve land,' he said. \\
+The plight of the orang asli villages along Putrajaya's border was highlighted by an online portal recently. \\
+The Report of the National Inquiry into the Land Rights of the Indigenous People (2013) stated that the Temuan from Bukit Tunggul, Dengkil, were asked to move twice - first when the area was given to the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (202.34ha) and then to Bukit Unggul Resort (557.66ha). \\
+On Monday, the online portal quoted a Bukit Tunggul orang asli, who refuted claims by the authorities that the villagers had received RM2mil in compensation to vacate their land. \\
+The orang asli said they were in the dark about any negotiations done on their behalf. \\
+Dr Nicholas claimed that the agreement between the then Orang Asli Affairs Department (now called Orang Asli Development Department) and the golf course developer was null and void as the deal had not been adhered to. \\
+He said the state government had sold off the land to the golf resort in 1993 and in the agreement, the sum was not to exceed RM2mil in compensation, which included construction of houses in Kg Kechau in Semenyih for 32 families, translocation of graves, monthly stipend of RM200 for six months, compensation for loss of trees, and the provision of water and electricity, a community hall and road infrastructure. \\
+'The Orang Asli Affairs Department was solely responsible for the resettlement because it undertook the responsibility,' he claimed. \\
+Moreover, Dr Nicholas also said that after the Selangor government resettled the orang asli from the UKM site to the Bukit Tunggul permanent forest reserves in the late 1970s, the state was supposed to gazette the land for them, but did not do so. \\
+Following the agreement in 1993, he said the orang asli were supposed to move to Kg Kechau in Semenyih, but some did not do so because the land belonged to another orang asli group. \\
+Furthermore, there were not enough land, houses or facilities there, he added."//
+(Sumber: Loh Foon Fong @ The Star, 17 March 2016: {{ :akhbar:nksubez2nmfssatzgakdpzmgikxu8gm8.pdf ||}}[[https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/03/17/time-to-resolve-orang-asli-land-issues-near-dengkil|"Time to resolve orang asli land issues near Dengkil"]]).
 ==== 2016-03-17: Pernyataan Menteri Besar Selangor ====
@@ Line 384: / Line 403: @@
 //"Mantan Prof Madya dan Sarjana Tamu di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Dr Mohamed Salleh Lamry, berkata kes tanah Orang Asal Bukit Tunggul di Dengkil, Sepang yang dijual oleh kerajaan negeri kepada swasta pada tahun 1993 adalah kes klasik mengenai dilema Orang Asal di negara ini. Katanya, perkara itu menimbulkan masalah yang berlarutan termasuk dinafikan kemudahan asas seperti elektrik dan air bersih. “Mengikut dapatan, kes sama juga berlaku di Sabah, namun saya tidak ada rekod mengenai Orang Asal di Sarawak, tapi saya yakin kes sama juga berlaku. “Jika mereka ini ada geran tanah, mungkin hal yang berlaku di Bukit Tunggul itu boleh dielakkan, selain tanah mereka takkan diambil sesuka hati,” katanya dalam wawancara eksklusif bersama FMT, di sini, semalam."// (Faridz Ridzwan @ Free Malaysia Today, March 30, 2016: {{ :akhbar:kerajaan_negeri_perlu_beri_geran_tanah_kepada_orang_asal_free_malaysia_today_fmt_.pdf ||}}[[https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/2016/03/30/kerajaan-negeri-perlu-beri-geran-tanah-kepada-orang-asal/|"Kerajaan negeri perlu beri geran tanah kepada Orang Asal"]]).
+==== 2020-11: Dapat Kajian Lapangan ====
+//"Di kawasan kajian ini, terdapat pertikaian dengan Orang Asli berkait dengan pemegang tanah Bukit Unggul Resort dan pihak pemaju yang ingin membangunkan lebuh raya dan tapak perumahan. Cadangan perancangan yang dibangunkan ini telah menimbulkan kemarahan masyarakat Orang Asli kerana sebahagian besar tanah mereka telah diambil bagi tujuan pembangunan. Bagi Orang Asli, pihak ini telah melakukan pencerobohan tanpa izin kerana mereka tidak mendapat sebarang makluman daripada pihak atasan berhubung dengan pembangunan yang ingin dibangunkan."// (Nurul Amira Abdul Wahab, Azima Abdul Manaf, November 2020: {{ :lampiran:faktor_yang_mendorong_pertikaian_terhadap_boleh_guna_tanah_milik_orang_asli.pdf ||}}[[https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i11.611|"Faktor yang Mendorong Pertikaian terhadap Boleh Guna Tanah Milik Orang Asli"]]).
 ==== 2021-05-22: Rencana Sukarelawan Muzium ====